Skip to main content

POSTPONED POSTS

We just wanted to post this quick update. We are going to postpone the Lucas series and other posts until after December 25. A date will be announced shortly. This fall has been busier than recently anticipated. Our goal is to be able to apply undivided focus on our subjects in order to offer quality analyses. Thank you for your continued patience. For the time being, we may (or may not) post from time to time prior to 12/25. Until then.

UPDATE: We'll restart this blog after 1/1/2018


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gloria Lucas, Part 3 of 4 : A Chicana Girl Leading Women to Colonize the Collective Body of Her People

****This part of the series was accepted for workshopping and presentation at the Public Philosophy Writing Workshop at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, which took place between May 18-19th**** For part 3, I'm to redirect our focus a bit from Lucas and her Nalgona Positivity [Pride] by addressing concerns about the body positivity movement in general. Imagine I drive a pickup truck, say, a 1998 Chevy, which requires the action of consuming more fossil fuels than most other types of vehicles. Now, assume I'm a member of a Late-model Chevy Truck Club, whose slogan reads:  “Loving my truck means unapologetically filling it with as many fossil fuels as I want.”  Clearly, mass consumption of fossil fuels is bad for the environment. However, assume my conscious intent is  NOT  to pollute the environment, but merely to have fun with my beloved truck. Y et also assume that I'm aware of the negative effects that mass consumption of fossil fuels has on the envi

Gloria Lucas, Part 4/4, An Individual Unprepared to Lead a Collective

Introduction  It seems Lucas is attempting to claim her feminism is somehow distinct from intersectional feminism. On social media, her “intellectual” or “activist” domain, she has openly blasted self-described intersectional feminists for (in her words) claiming solidarity with her or other women of color. On that point, I agree to a larger extent. However, Lucas cannot claim to have somehow developed anything remotely equal to an alternative framework of feminism, as this would be impossible insofar as she could not have developed anything to be taken seriously. The fact remains, however, that Lucas’s feminism is steeped entirely in intersectional feminist ideals and parlance. Adding to that, another fact remains that the only thing original about “her” version of this kind of feminism is that she simply swapped out the word ‘body’ from body positivity for the vulgar ‘nalgona’ and added the word ‘pride’ thus formulating the grammatically redundant ‘nalgona positivity [pride]’, t

The Case for Disassociation amid Collective Responsibility

Written by Jeremy Watkins-Quesada, Viva La Resistencia member ***This paper was presented at the International Conference on “Rethinking Responsibility: Agents and Structures”: John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada. KEYWORDS: collective responsibility, disassociation, genuine opposition thesis, genuine support, negative duty, old ways of thinking, evil practices, medical reasons, Leviathan 1. Introduction Juha Raikka argues against disassociation from collective responsibility based on a premise of logical inconsistency insofar as the conclusion ‘one is not guilty’ does not necessarily follow from the premise that ‘ everyone is guilty.’ Raikka builds his case on a fictionalized national, ethnic, or cultural group that participates in human sacrifices for the sake of ‘medical reasons’ or human health. [i] He concedes that this fictionalized group bears an uncanny resemblance to Western society and their proposed collective responsibility