Skip to main content

Nalgona Pride and Gloria Lucas: A Multi Post Series

We here at La Resistancia have become increasingly concerned with the influence that concepts like postmodernism and relativism and social constructionism have procured over the Chicano/a community. These movements have instilled a distrust in truth on the behalf of our people. Further, these movements in conjunction with the open mic style of this social media age has effectuated a punk-rock style anything goes approach to intellectualism and public discourse. Consequently, this lack of checks-and-balances for would-be community "leaders" has opened the proverbial floodgates between the podium and the community, which in turn has allowed some otherwise wet-behind-the-ears commentators to post at the former. This is not a good consequence.

What results thereby is a less than erudite interlocutor assuming the role of community leader while offering nothing but a swath of misinformation or incoherent body of information for his/her followers that in many cases are equally if not even less knowledgeable of the facts themselves. Add in the variable that this new leader is speaking her words to an ever growing collective body of ears relieved if not already desperate to believe what they are hearing from their newly espoused leader. Sounds familiar, doesn't it? It should. After all, we are (alas) amidst this era of Donald Trump's base whose proverbial armament in the form of fake news and alternative facts effectuates their analogous hijacking of the United States. Their leader, of course, is a dangerous ideologue whose permeation of baseless rhetoric are nothing more than projections of his own insecurities and personal biases. Have we such a figure in the community. The short and obvious answer: No.

Nevertheless, we do have at least a couple, if not a few, ideologues that have gained some recognition from social media to national mainstream media. We say ideologues because these figures tend to permeate misinformation or incoherent ideas as facts with which they intend to influence the community. The names of the previously unnamed notwithstanding-oh, okay, Virgie Tovar is the next target-one person we are referring to is Gloria Lucas. We will commence a series on Lucas's incoherent body of work, not to defame her or Nalgona Pride, but, in order to rectify some of the damage, which for the most part sows the seeds of anti-intellectualism-an infection of the mind we simply do not need in our community. Just look at the state of the country.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gloria Lucas, Part 3 of 4 : A Chicana Girl Leading Women to Colonize the Collective Body of Her People

****This part of the series was accepted for workshopping and presentation at the Public Philosophy Writing Workshop at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, which took place between May 18-19th**** For part 3, I'm to redirect our focus a bit from Lucas and her Nalgona Positivity [Pride] by addressing concerns about the body positivity movement in general. Imagine I drive a pickup truck, say, a 1998 Chevy, which requires the action of consuming more fossil fuels than most other types of vehicles. Now, assume I'm a member of a Late-model Chevy Truck Club, whose slogan reads:  “Loving my truck means unapologetically filling it with as many fossil fuels as I want.”  Clearly, mass consumption of fossil fuels is bad for the environment. However, assume my conscious intent is  NOT  to pollute the environment, but merely to have fun with my beloved truck. Y et also assume that I'm aware of the negative effects that mass consumption of fossil fuels has on the envi

Gloria Lucas, Part 4/4, An Individual Unprepared to Lead a Collective

Introduction  It seems Lucas is attempting to claim her feminism is somehow distinct from intersectional feminism. On social media, her “intellectual” or “activist” domain, she has openly blasted self-described intersectional feminists for (in her words) claiming solidarity with her or other women of color. On that point, I agree to a larger extent. However, Lucas cannot claim to have somehow developed anything remotely equal to an alternative framework of feminism, as this would be impossible insofar as she could not have developed anything to be taken seriously. The fact remains, however, that Lucas’s feminism is steeped entirely in intersectional feminist ideals and parlance. Adding to that, another fact remains that the only thing original about “her” version of this kind of feminism is that she simply swapped out the word ‘body’ from body positivity for the vulgar ‘nalgona’ and added the word ‘pride’ thus formulating the grammatically redundant ‘nalgona positivity [pride]’, t

The Case for Disassociation amid Collective Responsibility

Written by Jeremy Watkins-Quesada, Viva La Resistencia member ***This paper was presented at the International Conference on “Rethinking Responsibility: Agents and Structures”: John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada. KEYWORDS: collective responsibility, disassociation, genuine opposition thesis, genuine support, negative duty, old ways of thinking, evil practices, medical reasons, Leviathan 1. Introduction Juha Raikka argues against disassociation from collective responsibility based on a premise of logical inconsistency insofar as the conclusion ‘one is not guilty’ does not necessarily follow from the premise that ‘ everyone is guilty.’ Raikka builds his case on a fictionalized national, ethnic, or cultural group that participates in human sacrifices for the sake of ‘medical reasons’ or human health. [i] He concedes that this fictionalized group bears an uncanny resemblance to Western society and their proposed collective responsibility